Fruit fly wings with ant picture




Nov062013

There’s a pretty remarkable fly photograph making the rounds of social media today, and while it originally had me going “Oooooh!”, the more I think about it, the more I feel like we’re staring at clouds.
It started when Ziya Tong tweeted a photo of a Goniurellia tridens (a fruit fly in the family Tephritidae) displaying its wings:

Do the wing patterns look a bit like ants to you? The photo has since been picked up by a number of high profile sites, like the New York Times Dot Earth BlogWhy Evolution is True and It’s Okay To Be Smart because, hey, it looks like this fly brings friends with it where ever it goes. I’m all for flies getting some positive exposure & attention, but the more I look at this fly and think about its relatives & evolutionary history, the more I think we’re all reading too much into that pattern.
This stellate (star-like) wing pattern is very common among flies in the Tephritinae, the subfamily of fruit flies this species belongs to, although the specifics differ between species and genera. Here are the wing patterns of the other Goniurellia species (found across the Mediterranean, Middle East, Africa and Asia).
Goniurellia wings Freidberg 1980
Fruit fly flashes its wings which has ant picture when threatened


It’s easy to think that species in far away places like the Middle East and Africa have special, exotic adaptations, but in fact we have equally cool species in our own backyards. If you look closely at some of the species nearby, you can see this general wing pattern is conserved in other tephritine genera, like Trupaneaand Euarestoides, just without the darker “eyespot” (technically called a bulla, a dark, blister-like bubble of the wing membrane, which can be found in other local-but-less-ant-like wing patterns, such as Euaresta bella‘s).

Trupanea actinobola

Euarestoides abstersus
Another theory that’s been circulating is that rather than ants, the wing patterns may be representations of jumping spiders. Again, there’s some precedence for this, as several Rhagoletis & Zonosemataspecies (which are fruit crop pests, and thus more heavily studied) have been shown to hold their wings in such a way as to give them the appearance of an 8-legged threat. But these flies put on a grand charade,using their entire bodies to fool predators into backing down, not just the tips of their wings. Additionally, the spider mimicking flies are in a totally different subfamily, and while the higher relationships of Tephritidae are still being figured out, as far as I can tell no one has ever suggested spider-mimicking wings are an ancestral state shared by both subfamilies, and would therefore argue there’s not a strong evolutionary link. That’s not to say there’s not some form of convergence occurring, but it’s important to note that the ant-winged flies are more closely related to species that look like this

Campiglossa albiceps
and this

Eutreta novaeboracensis
than they are to species that look like this

Rhagoletis cornivora
In all of these examples though, we’re looking at the wings splayed out, and not than in their natural resting position. Take a look at this Trupanea actinobola photo by Steve Marshall showing how the wings look when not in use.

Trupanea actinobola
When the two patterns are put together, the “ants” would be standing on top of the other’s feet, which isn’t exactly the most natural behaviour for an ant. It’s possible that the wing patterns together are serving as a false-head (as suggested to me by Richard Jones on Twitter), and thus tricking predators into attacking the wing tips first (which would still be bad for the fly’s ability to fly) or into attacking the false-head from “behind”, thus putting them squarely in front of the true head and easily watched and avoided by the fly. This strikes me as a pretty reasonable argument, but why might there be so much variation in wing patterns if species are using them as a false head?
Another factor to consider is what other uses wing patterns may have besides predator avoidance. Many fruit flies, especially those within the Tephritinae, have very complex mating rituals, and will perform routines that can involve any combination of leg waving, body swelling and wing waving & supinating (plus many other behaviours). Of course, if these wing patterns and flag-waving behaviours are for the female’s benefit, then it would follow that they can actually see and recognize the patterns and routines. While chemical stimuli (both from host plants and aggregating flies) are generally believed to draw individuals from long ranges into close proximity, it seems that fruit flies have very strong visual acuity, and can correctly identify conspecifics based on wing patterning when presented with a choice (Headrick & Goeden, 1994). This means that small changes in wing pattern can help diverging populations sort themselves out, even if host plants and other factors remain the same.
Returning to the viral ant-winged photo, it would appear that the fly is supinating its wings (twisting the wing 90o and pressing forwards to display patterns), which can occur both when a species is pretending they’re a threatening spider as well as in species with courtship wing displays, which doesn’t help us decide what’s going on — is there a female just off camera that’s being courted, or is the fly threatened by the giant camera lens in its face? However, if you look closely at the photo you can see that the middle and hind legs are actually curled up under the body and the fore legs are not resting in a natural position at all — they look more like a ballerina en pointe, with the last leg segments curled and with the tops of the “feet” (the tarsomeres) resting on the surface of the substrate — which leads me to believe the fly in the photo may be dead, or at least heavily compromised, and not actively displaying its wings at all!
Putting everything together, it leads me to believe we may be choosing to see ants where they don’t actually exist. Much like how we see sharks in the clouds or Jesus in our toast (a psychological phenomenon calledPareidolia), I think we’ve become so conditioned to expect ornate patterns on wings to be mimicking something else that we’re forcing objects to appear everywhere, even if there’s no evolutionary or behavioural explanation for it. It’s important that we don’t let our human-centric points of view, emotions and opinions bias our interpretation of what’s really going on. The fact that there are so many amazing and believable mimicry strategies in the world of insects is awe-inspiring, but rather than trying to fit them all in to the same box, we should instead be working to understand what crazy new idea natural selection is experimenting with now.
Neaspilota albidipennis
Neaspilota albidipennis
—-
Freidberg A. (1980). A revision of the genus Goniurellia Hendel (Diptera: Tephritidae), Journal of the Entomological Society of Southern Africa, 43 (2) 257-274. 
Headrick D.H. & Goeden R.D. (1994). Reproductive behavior of California fruit flies and the classification and evolution of Tephritidae (Diptera) mating systems, Studia Dipterologica, 1 (2) 194-252.
Fruit fly wing photos and Trupanea actinobola live habitus from:
Jackson M.D., Marshall S.A., Hanner R. & Norrbom A.L. (2011). The Fruit Flies (Tephritidae) of Ontario,Canadian Journal of Arthropod Identification, 15 1-251. DOI: 



 45 Responses to “Ants, spiders, or wishful thinking?”

Comments (28)Pingbacks (17)
  1. That is a fascinating explanation. Thanks for going into so much detail!
  2. Wonderful! Yet, this too is a hypothesis and one I would not automatically accept even if it is of contrarian mundanity. To decide the question is to ask which explanation is simpler? Your explanation might tempt one to bias in the opposite way but that is confusing mundanity with simplicity. I do not have an answer but I will go through a thought exercise.
    One can inspect the variation in the pattern across the species and apart from genus or family to decide whether it is truly random and merely triggering false matches in our pattern detectors or serves some utility. A stable pattern within a more variable family pattern is merely a trace of its evolution. The less the species variation, the more fixed in the genetics the less like shark in a cloud it is. So if it is not random why would it be selected for? It could be prey avoidance or mating or likely, merely correlated with something else that is selected for. But of course that is only one level of random, it’s possible that particular pattern evolved by chance.
    So the question really is how likely is it for events to align such that the wings are displayed to say a predator and aid in escape. If by random chance and across all encounters, the statistics are enough to offer some advantage in say adversary confusion then tuning the pattern (likely selected on primarily for non protective reasons) may well be one of some advantage to the insect genetics. It could very well be an indirect exploit of some conserved part of visual processing. You’re assuming it is only possible for us to falsely recognize images.
    I cannot say that yours is automatically the better hypothesis even though it is less interesting. Because other than the above, what strikes me unlike all other examples of false patterns is how stable and faithful it is across various lighting conditions and angles. Most false patterns require time to discern, attention to maintain and can sometimes morph or are at least exchangeable to some other near thing. So I remain uncertain.
    • Wow, could you have made your point any more pseudo-intelligent and difficult to read? It’s very badly written. It’s perfectly possible to get your opinion across without seeming like you are spewing thesaurus alternatives twice per sentence.
      “You’re assuming it is only possible for us to falsely recognize images.”… no he isn’t, he’s just accumulating sensible opposing views and pointing out that the people are too quick to accept what they have been told from a viral image without thinking about the theory.


Fruit Fly with wings of ant picture


 Of all the resplendent beauties in the insect kingdom, few might look to the humble fruit fly for its delicacy or charm.
But a closer examination of the transparent wings of Goniurellia tridens reveals a piece of evolutionary art. Each wing carries a precisely detailed image of an ant-like insect, complete with six legs, two antennae, a head, thorax and tapered abdomen.
"The image on the wing is absolutely perfect," says Dr Brigitte Howarth, the fly specialist at Zayed University who first discovered G tridens in the UAE.
It is a member of tephritidae, a family - there are two - of 5,000 species of fruit flies whose colourful markings have earned them the name "peacock flies".
In the UAE alone, 27 picture wing species are known. Some have wings bearing simple shapes but others, like G tridens, are far more complex.
Dr Howarth first saw G tridens on an oleander shrub in northern Oman. "I was looking at the stem of the leaves and I noticed that there were some insects crawling around. When I sort of honed in I started to notice what I thought was a couple of ants moving around."
At first she suspected an infestation on the fly's wings. "But it was so symmetrical that I thought, 'oh this is not possible'. When I got it under the microscope I realised that these were insects painted onto the wings."
In contrast to its wings and brilliant green eyes, the fly's body is a dull greenish grey - "almost cryptically coloured," says Dr Howarth - that blends into the leaves where it is found.
When threatened, the fly flashes its wings to give the appearance of ants walking back and forth. The predator gets confused and the fly zips off.
This defence mechanism may also make the fly attractive to potential mates - something that is less of a concern for the average housefly.
"A lot of flies, if a male sees a female that is suitable it just flies up and tries to latch on," said Dr Howarth. But G tridens has an altogether more amorous courtship, showing off its wings in a colourful dance. And Dr Howarth believes it is no exception.
"If you look at the behaviour, it tells you a lot about the functionality," said Dr Howarth. "Not everybody gets to mate. The ones that do have something about them that make them more attractive.
"Is it the same in other invertebrates, who knows? It's very possible that those are in fact for courtship behaviour."
This elaborate behaviour may be a response to the fly's restrictive environment. "Something that can survive anywhere doesn't need to have as many protection factors," said Dr Howarth.
The more realistic the picture on the wing, the better its chance of survival and reproduction.
"It's all about optimising your possibilities of survival. There's always variety and some individuals, for whatever reason, have more of a success because of that variation."
G tridens's looks have served it well. Since it was identified in 1910, it has been found in the Near and Middle East, India, and central Asia.
Females lay eggs in plant tissue, like fruits and flowers, where the larvae feed. This does not usually harm the plant but many fruit flies are still considered pests.
Whether a pest or a flying piece of art, it is around us every day.
"I would say most people that have sat in their gardens with a cool orange juice or water in their hand in the early morning sun and looked down at the ground would have seen a picture-wing fly."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

VMware fix for Invalid manifest and ova file import failed errors

SOAPUI - import certificate

Centrally Managed Users (CMU) - New Feature in Oracle Database 18c